Considerations To Know About documents of property must present before court case law

Considerations To Know About documents of property must present before court case law

Blog Article

Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by law." It truly is effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust accessible remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, It is usually a perfectly-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is topic for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.

limitation of liability towards the extent of the cap provided from the registered mortgage deed(Banking Regulation)

Note: Please fill any field and Click on Search button, if you do not know the complete information please leave industry blank.

94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's nicely-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. In case the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then method the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, given that the ninety days for your department to act has already expired. About the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided with the decision of your Supreme Court in the case of Dr.

82 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based to the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

only about the ground of miscases remanded & only within the ground of misreading of evidence only over the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)

48 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice with the Peace u/s 22-A will not be obliged to afford a chance of hearing towards the accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to look at all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are some of the relevant factors. Read more

This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners failed a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based within the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of your case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. Read more

The regulation of necessity acknowledged and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it was the illegal action called regulation read more of necessity..

Alternative Punishment: In certain cases, the court may possibly have the discretion to award life imprisonment as an alternative for the death penalty. Life imprisonment entails the offender spending the remainder of their life at the rear of bars without the possibility of parole or early release.

She did note that the boy still needed comprehensive therapy in order to cope with his abusive past, and “to reach the point of being Protected with other children.” The boy was getting counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved from the actions.

However, it’s essential to note that the application on the death penalty is matter to several legal safeguards and because of process to make certain fair trials.

Even though the death penalty is irreversible, life imprisonment allows for that possibility of reconsideration or commutation with the sentence in certain circumstances.